Skip to main content

History: You can only kick so long: AIM leadership in Neb. 70s

"You Can Only Kick So Long..."
American Indian Movement leadership in Nebraska 1972-1979

by W. Dale Mason
Reprinted with Permission-Originally Printed in Journal of the West 1984

Following the "re-occupation" of Alcatraz Island by Federal authorities in late 1971 after a two-year "occupation" by Indians living near San Francisco, the emerging nationwide Indian movement entered a new phase. Between the mid-1960s and 1971 there had been numerous "fish-ins" and seizures of Federal property by young Indian activists. Many of these acts of direct confrontation occurred without a great deal of planning. They often lacked a broad base of support among the Indian people living in the areas where they took place. Alcatraz itself was not of major concern to many indigenous California Indians. The impetus for the occupation of the Island had come from Indian college students living in the Bay Area led by Richard Oaks, a 27 year-old Mohawk from the St.Regis Reservation in New York. What was needed was an incident that could be exploited locally and used by activist leaders as a local as well as national organizing tool. Sioux author Vine Deloria, Jr., had seen this early on. In Custer Died For Your Sins Deloria had observed that unless Indian activists placed more emphasis on exploiting local situations they would not have much impact. (*1) During 1972 and 1973 the American Indian Movement (AIM) was able to do this effectively in several instances, most notably in Gordon, Nebraska, and on the Pine Ridge Reservation in South Dakota. The New York Times had called Gordon, Nebraska a "White Man's Town." (*2) But in the 1970s it played a significant role in the new movement of activism among American Indians. Here in early 1972 the American Indian Movement made its first major impact in a non-urban setting, and here, throughout most of the 1970s there occurred a continuing series of confrontations between local authorities and a small group of supporters of the American Indian Movement.

Located fifteen miles from the South Dakota border, Gordon is a small (population 2,200) rural town not unlike countless others throughout the Plains. But it is a "border town" and that fact dominates much of how life is conducted there. Roughly ten percent of Gordons population is Indian, but that fluctuates as people come and go across the border to the Pine Ridge Reservation. Indians come to Gordon to look for work and to shop. The near total absence of places to shop on the Reservation and the prohibition of the sale of alcohol there brings a steady flow of Indians to Gordon and other nearby towns. According to former Oglala Sioux Tribal Chairman Albert Trimble, 90 percent of the income earned in the village of Pine Ridge is spent in Nebraska. Trimble admitted that he had borrowed money from a Nebraska bank in order to run for Tribal Chairman. Indians had for years charged that economic discrimination and a dual standard of justice existed in the Nebraska Panhandle. There were charges by Indians of police brutality, and accusations that Indians were arrested far in excess of their population percentage. The American Indian Movement became involved in Gordon and the issues came to a head in early March 1972 following the discovery of the body of Raymond Yellow Thunder, a 51 year-old Lakota Sioux from Pine Ridge. On the evening of 12 February, during a Saturday night dance in the Gordon American Legion Hall, Yellow Thunder was stripped of his pants and pushed into the Hall while the dance was underway. Eight days later two young boys found his body in the cab of a pick-up truck in a Gordon used car lot. An autopsy attributed his death to a cerebral hemorrhage. He had been dead for more than two days. Sheridan County Attorney Michael V. Smith called the incident at the American Legion Hall "a very cruel practical joke."(*3)

Read more of article by clicking link:
http://web.archive.org/web/20091027062155/www.geocities.com/lakotastudentalliance/lsa2_onlykicksolong.html

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

LSA History: Mt. Rushmore Gathering 1996 & LSA Statement

Students Gather at Mt. Rushmore Effort Made to explain land struggle by Karen Testerman Indian Country Today. Feb. 29, 1996. B-1. He Sapa: Not For Sale 2.29.96 BLACK HILLS, SD - Wanting to educate visitors on the struggles of the Lakota people, Lakota students recently gathered at Mount Rushmore. The Lakota Student Alliance organized a public assembly at Mount Rushmore to coincide with an MTV filming of a performance by rock band The Presidents of the United States of America, which aired nationally President's Day. The students expressed an alternative viewpoint of the four presidents carved in the mountain and the reasons why the Sioux Nation continues to refuse monetary compensation from the United States government. "We still believe the Black Hills are the heart of our nation," students said. "We must negotiate the unconditional return of our land." In 1980, the United States tried to right a wrong by awarding the Sioux Nation monies for the Black Hills,

LSA Statement regarding Richard Marshall

Statement Regarding Richard Marshall’s Motion to Quash a Subpoena in the trial of John Graham: What is the truth? South Dakota justice system seeks lies as truth in Indian country. November 30, 2010 - What becomes of a country when it’s indigenous people are being taught that, in a foreign court of law, lying under oath is a truthful lie and that truthful lie will set you free? Back in the 1970s when Sovereignty was an idea of the red power movement, Indians were just beginning to examine corruption in their tribal governments. Today, Sovereignty means something different. Today we see that Sovereignty banner in every gaming compact negotiation where tribal leaders plead to states for more slot machines, while the racist state bargains for more jurisdiction in Indian Country, keeping in mind the states goal of gaining more Indian lands. In 1973, Richard Marshall was one of those early Sovereignty rights advocates as he traveled with leaders like Pedro Bissonette. In Apr

Mario Gonzalez: Why the Docket 74-A award must be rejected

The following biography and essay are written by the author: (Mario Gonzalez is an enrolled member of the Oglala Sioux Tribe and presently serves as legal counsel to several Sioux tribes. He is the first recipient of the Distinguished Aboriginal Lawyer Achievement Award (1995) given by the Native Law Center of Canada, University of Saskatchewan, Saskatoon, Sask. He is also co-author of The Politics of Hallowed Ground: Wounded Knee and the Struggle for Indian Sovereignty (1999). He can be reached at mario@mariogonzalezlaw.com). [Part One] Why the Docket 74-A award must be rejected By Mario Gonzalez A federal class action lawsuit called Different Horse v. Salazar was filed in U.S. District Court by the Ketterling Law Firm of Yankton, S.D. on April 15, 2009, to force the Interior Department to distribute the Dockets 74-A and 74-B Sioux land claims awards in per capita payments to tribal members. The awards with (interest) now total over $1 billion. The Rosebud Sioux Tribe has taken the le