Skip to main content

Unequal pay, retaliation alleged in Lakota woman's lawsuit against Crescent Electric Supply Company.

March 22, 2014 - A Rapid City woman is claiming a local company, including several of its top administrators, sexually discriminated against her by paying her less than her male co-workers, for performing commensurate sales duties, and then denying her any sales commissions for the contracts she won. She was then, allegedly, retaliated against by company officials when she complained.

Lisa Davis is seeking actual and punitive damages from Crescent Electric Supply Company for what she calls the company's "reckless disregard" of her federally protected rights, under the. Equal Pay Act of 1963, and the Lilly Ledbetter Fair Pay Act of 2009.

Davis, who had worked at the electric supply company since 2005, filed the lawsuit in February, 2012 in the United States District Court.

In the petition, Davis claims that after successfully working in a clerical position for the company for more than four years, she was recruited to fill a sales position.

After working in her new sales position for six months, and winning more than $1 million in sales contracts for the company, she inquired about her commissions, and was told that she would not be paid any. Shortly thereafter, she was removed from her sales position and placed in the company’s warehouse for a month, before she was moved again; this time to a position in which she was directed to provide clerical support for the in-house male sales reps.

Subsequently, the lawsuit claims, commissions on Davis' sales were paid out to various male sales reps that she worked with, while she was never paid any commissions at all. After she filed her complaint with the Chicago regional EEO office, Davis alleges she was retaliated against by company officials, including James Sullivan, Regional Manager for Crescent Electric Supply.

The EEO issued “Right to Sue” letters to Davis in December, 2011. A simultaneous complaint was also filed with the Office for Federal Contractor Compliance, which oversees EEO compliance for all contractors of entities that receive federal monies. The majority of Davis' sales were for such entities. Federal Contractors found to be out of compliance with EEO regulations can lose their eligibility for future government contracts.

Davis is also an enrolled member of the Oglala Sioux Tribe or Oglala Lakota Nation.

Additional Sources:

Comments

  1. I applied for a job with Crescent Electric, Rapid City, in 2010. At the time, my daughter was employed there, and her supervisor told her that I couldn't be considered for the job because it would be a conflict of interest for us to both be working there. Now, 4 years later, they have hired the husband of the woman who eventually replaced my daughter. I am, obviously, Lakota and Mexican. The man they hired and his wife are both white. Apparently, they only considered it a conflict of interest for minorities, but not for whites. They pick and choose who they hire - their own online policy states that they give priority to hiring those recruited by their present employees - that does not demonstrate "Equal Opportunity" as far as I am concerned. Yet, they receive a lot of business from government entities funded by taxpayers, of which I am one! I hope the Office for Federal Contractor Compliance takes this offense seriously! They need to be held accountable for their discriminatory practices! ~ Olivia

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

LSA History: Mt. Rushmore Gathering 1996 & LSA Statement

Students Gather at Mt. Rushmore Effort Made to explain land struggle by Karen Testerman Indian Country Today. Feb. 29, 1996. B-1. He Sapa: Not For Sale 2.29.96 BLACK HILLS, SD - Wanting to educate visitors on the struggles of the Lakota people, Lakota students recently gathered at Mount Rushmore. The Lakota Student Alliance organized a public assembly at Mount Rushmore to coincide with an MTV filming of a performance by rock band The Presidents of the United States of America, which aired nationally President's Day. The students expressed an alternative viewpoint of the four presidents carved in the mountain and the reasons why the Sioux Nation continues to refuse monetary compensation from the United States government. "We still believe the Black Hills are the heart of our nation," students said. "We must negotiate the unconditional return of our land." In 1980, the United States tried to right a wrong by awarding the Sioux Nation monies for the Black Hills,

LSA Statement regarding Richard Marshall

Statement Regarding Richard Marshall’s Motion to Quash a Subpoena in the trial of John Graham: What is the truth? South Dakota justice system seeks lies as truth in Indian country. November 30, 2010 - What becomes of a country when it’s indigenous people are being taught that, in a foreign court of law, lying under oath is a truthful lie and that truthful lie will set you free? Back in the 1970s when Sovereignty was an idea of the red power movement, Indians were just beginning to examine corruption in their tribal governments. Today, Sovereignty means something different. Today we see that Sovereignty banner in every gaming compact negotiation where tribal leaders plead to states for more slot machines, while the racist state bargains for more jurisdiction in Indian Country, keeping in mind the states goal of gaining more Indian lands. In 1973, Richard Marshall was one of those early Sovereignty rights advocates as he traveled with leaders like Pedro Bissonette. In Apr

Mario Gonzalez: Why the Docket 74-A award must be rejected

The following biography and essay are written by the author: (Mario Gonzalez is an enrolled member of the Oglala Sioux Tribe and presently serves as legal counsel to several Sioux tribes. He is the first recipient of the Distinguished Aboriginal Lawyer Achievement Award (1995) given by the Native Law Center of Canada, University of Saskatchewan, Saskatoon, Sask. He is also co-author of The Politics of Hallowed Ground: Wounded Knee and the Struggle for Indian Sovereignty (1999). He can be reached at mario@mariogonzalezlaw.com). [Part One] Why the Docket 74-A award must be rejected By Mario Gonzalez A federal class action lawsuit called Different Horse v. Salazar was filed in U.S. District Court by the Ketterling Law Firm of Yankton, S.D. on April 15, 2009, to force the Interior Department to distribute the Dockets 74-A and 74-B Sioux land claims awards in per capita payments to tribal members. The awards with (interest) now total over $1 billion. The Rosebud Sioux Tribe has taken the le