Skip to main content

Missouri River: Dakota Access given green light by Army Corps. 

On January 24, 2017, Trump signed a memo that instructed the secretary of the Army to expedite approval of the pipeline.

On February 7, 2017, the Army Corps of Engineers (USACOE) announced they had completed a review of the pipeline and granted the final easement to Dakota Access so they can finish the final portion of their pipeline which is to drill under the Missouri River near the Lake Oahe Dam.

Note: Great Sioux Nation Tribes and Agriculture groups downstream have access to use of the Missouri River waters for drinking and other uses.

Video: Standing Rock part 1

North Dakota does not recognize the Great Sioux Nation established by the 1851 or 1868 Treaties. The Great Sioux Reservation was later established under the 1868 treaty. North Dakota's ignorance is why the Dakota Access Pipe Line (DAPL) moved their project within the 1851 boundaries established by US Constitutional Treaties ratified by the US Congress. Filmmakers from Viceland visited the #nodapl water protectors at the site of the pipeline. The result was a short documentary showing what the Great Sioux Nation and allies are up against.

Viceland introduces part 1: "The people of the Standing Rock Indian Reservation of North and South Dakota fight to stop a pipeline from being built on their ancestral homeland"


Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Support Generations Indigenous Ways

Generations Indigenous Ways bridges Traditional Lakota knowledge and scientific knowledge, helping to develop a new generation of Indigenous scientists and thinkers. Will you donate to Generations Indigenous Ways and invest in a brighter future for Lakota youth, their families and communities? Learn how you can be a part of Generations Indigenous Ways' living classrooms - visit our website: GIWays.org Visit their YouTube channel https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lnARDSYhLZ8
The Invasion of America. An interactive map produced by author Claudio Saunt - Aeon. Read: " The US must not forget its history of dispossession ." By Claudio Saunt, Aeon.

Mario Gonzalez: Why the Docket 74-A award must be rejected

The following biography and essay are written by the author: (Mario Gonzalez is an enrolled member of the Oglala Sioux Tribe and presently serves as legal counsel to several Sioux tribes. He is the first recipient of the Distinguished Aboriginal Lawyer Achievement Award (1995) given by the Native Law Center of Canada, University of Saskatchewan, Saskatoon, Sask. He is also co-author of The Politics of Hallowed Ground: Wounded Knee and the Struggle for Indian Sovereignty (1999). He can be reached at mario@mariogonzalezlaw.com). [Part One] Why the Docket 74-A award must be rejected By Mario Gonzalez A federal class action lawsuit called Different Horse v. Salazar was filed in U.S. District Court by the Ketterling Law Firm of Yankton, S.D. on April 15, 2009, to force the Interior Department to distribute the Dockets 74-A and 74-B Sioux land claims awards in per capita payments to tribal members. The awards with (interest) now total over $1 billion. The Rosebud Sioux Tribe has taken the le...