Skip to main content

Richard Marshall found not guilty in 1975 AIM slaying

Richard Marshall found not guilty in 1975 AIM slaying

Heidi Bell Gease Journal staff | Posted: Friday, April 23, 2010 6:30 am

A federal jury deliberated for less than two hours Thursday before finding Vine Richard "Dickie" Marshall not guilty of murder in connection with the 1975 slaying of American Indian Movement activist Annie Mae Aquash.

Marshall's supporters, who filled one side of the U.S. District courtroom, erupted in cheers and applause when the verdict was read about 2 p.m. Marshall stood and hugged Dana Hanna, his court-appointed attorney.

Afterward, Hanna noted that people have said a Native American cannot get a fair trial in front of an all-white jury in South Dakota. "We have proved them wrong today," he said.

Prosecutors had tried to prove that Marshall, 59, provided the handgun used to kill Aquash, who some in AIM believed was a government informant.

Arlo Looking Cloud, who was convicted in 2004 of her murder and is serving life in prison, was the government's key witness. After years of denying that he, John Graham, Theda Clarke and Aquash had stopped at Marshall's home in Allen just hours before Aquash was killed near Wanblee, Looking Cloud came forward in 2008 to say they had stopped in Allen and that Marshall had given them a handgun.

On the witness stand last week, Looking Cloud claimed he did not tell the story sooner because he was afraid of Marshall.

Assistant U.S. Attorney Robert Mandel suggested to jurors that there was another reason Looking Cloud didn't talk sooner. If he had mentioned going to Marshall's to get a gun, Looking Cloud would have been admitting he knew Aquash would be killed, Mandel said.

Mandel cited evidence that Clarke had given Graham a note that read something like, "take care of this baggage."

"Folks, there wasn't any baggage," he said. "There was only a human being they wanted taken care of, and that was Annie Mae Pictou ... ‘Take care of it?' Hey, you can draw your own conclusions as to what that meant."

In order for Marshall to be convicted, federal prosecutors had to prove beyond a reasonable doubt that he had both provided the gun and known it would be used to kill Aquash. Hanna suggested in his closing arguments that the government had proven neither.

"This case of the government consists of the words that came out of Arlo Looking Cloud's mouth and Serle Chapman's mouth," neither of which Hanna said were credible.

Hanna argued that Looking Cloud made up the story about Marshall in hopes of getting out of prison and because Looking Cloud believed Marshall had "ratted him out" to investigators.

And Hanna questioned why Chapman, a British writer, did not tell investigators until 2008 about an unrecorded conversation in which he said he asked Marshall about the gun.

Hanna also addressed what he called the "elephant in the room": Who ordered Aquash's death? He said AIM leader Dennis Banks, along with Leonard Peltier, had the most to fear from her because she knew about their criminal activities and had heard Peltier confess to shooting two FBI agents.

"She was killed because of what might happen in the future," Hanna said. "She could have put Dennis Banks and Leonard Peltier away for decades," he said.

Denise Pictou Maloney, the older of Aquash's two daughters, had said before the verdict that the case was a step toward justice, regardless of its outcome, because of the evidence that came forth.

The verdict "was a toss, we knew that," she said Thursday. "But it is what it is. And in our territory, the fact that he saw my mother at his house with those people, and did nothing to help her, makes him an accessory in our eyes. And he will never be forgiven for that in our territory."

A jury of five women and seven men began deliberating the case at 11:35 a.m. Thursday, more than a week after the trial began. Jurors contacted late Thursday afternoon declined to comment.

Marshall could not be reached for comment.

Contact Heidi Bell Gease at 394-8419 or heidi.bell@rapidcityjournal.com


http://www.rapidcityjournal.com/news/article_ef7b952c-4e30-11df-a36b-001cc4c03286.html

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Support Generations Indigenous Ways

Generations Indigenous Ways bridges Traditional Lakota knowledge and scientific knowledge, helping to develop a new generation of Indigenous scientists and thinkers. Will you donate to Generations Indigenous Ways and invest in a brighter future for Lakota youth, their families and communities? Learn how you can be a part of Generations Indigenous Ways' living classrooms - visit our website: GIWays.org Visit their YouTube channel https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lnARDSYhLZ8
The Invasion of America. An interactive map produced by author Claudio Saunt - Aeon. Read: " The US must not forget its history of dispossession ." By Claudio Saunt, Aeon.

History: You can only kick so long: AIM leadership in Neb. 70s

"You Can Only Kick So Long..." American Indian Movement leadership in Nebraska 1972-1979 by W. Dale Mason Reprinted with Permission-Originally Printed in Journal of the West 1984 Following the "re-occupation" of Alcatraz Island by Federal authorities in late 1971 after a two-year "occupation" by Indians living near San Francisco, the emerging nationwide Indian movement entered a new phase. Between the mid-1960s and 1971 there had been numerous "fish-ins" and seizures of Federal property by young Indian activists. Many of these acts of direct confrontation occurred without a great deal of planning. They often lacked a broad base of support among the Indian people living in the areas where they took place. Alcatraz itself was not of major concern to many indigenous California Indians. The impetus for the occupation of the Island had come from Indian college students living in the Bay Area led by Richard Oaks, a 27 year-old Mohawk from the St.Regis...