Skip to main content

Trials in AIM slaying moved to late November

By Journal staff Posted: Friday, May 14, 2010 3:24 pm
Rapid City Journal Article

The murder trial of John Graham and Thelma Rios has been moved to Nov. 29.

Graham, 54, and Rios, 64, are charged in connection with the 1975 slaying of American Indian Movement activist Annie Mae Aquash. The state charges involve incidents that allegedly took place in Rapid City shortly before Aquash was killed on Pine Ridge Indian Reservation.

The trial, which is expected to last three weeks, had been scheduled for July.

During a Friday hearing, 7th Circuit Judge Jack Delaney also granted a request to remove defense attorney Matt Stephens from Rios' case. Rios' other attorney, Matt Kinney, said he would ask Delaney to appoint new co-counsel.

Rios' attorneys have asked that her trial be severed from Graham's, but Delaney has not ruled on that motion.

Two other men have already been tried in federal court for Aquash's murder. Arlo Looking Cloud was convicted in 2004 and is serving a sentence of life in prison. Richard "Dickie" Marshall was acquitted after a trial here last month.

The state charges filed against Graham and Rios are punishable by life in prison upon conviction. Graham is in custody. Rios is free on bond.

Contact Heidi Bell Gease at 394-8419 or heidi.bell@rapidcityjournal.com

http://www.rapidcityjournal.com/news/article_39233494-5f9f-11df-8303-001cc4c03286.html

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Support Generations Indigenous Ways

Generations Indigenous Ways bridges Traditional Lakota knowledge and scientific knowledge, helping to develop a new generation of Indigenous scientists and thinkers. Will you donate to Generations Indigenous Ways and invest in a brighter future for Lakota youth, their families and communities? Learn how you can be a part of Generations Indigenous Ways' living classrooms - visit our website: GIWays.org Visit their YouTube channel https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lnARDSYhLZ8
Unequal pay, retaliation alleged in Lakota woman's lawsuit against Crescent Electric Supply Company. March 22, 2014 - A Rapid City woman is claiming a local company, including several of its top administrators, sexually discriminated against her by paying her less than her male co-workers, for performing commensurate sales duties, and then denying her any sales commissions for the contracts she won. She was then, allegedly, retaliated against by company officials when she complained. Lisa Davis is seeking actual and punitive damages from Crescent Electric Supply Company for what she calls the company's "reckless disregard" of her federally protected rights, under the. Equal Pay Act of 1963, and the Lilly Ledbetter Fair Pay Act of 2009. Davis, who had worked at the electric supply company since 2005, filed the lawsuit in February, 2012 in the United States District Court. In the petition, Davis claims that after successfully working in a clerical position for ...

Mario Gonzalez: Why the Docket 74-A award must be rejected

The following biography and essay are written by the author: (Mario Gonzalez is an enrolled member of the Oglala Sioux Tribe and presently serves as legal counsel to several Sioux tribes. He is the first recipient of the Distinguished Aboriginal Lawyer Achievement Award (1995) given by the Native Law Center of Canada, University of Saskatchewan, Saskatoon, Sask. He is also co-author of The Politics of Hallowed Ground: Wounded Knee and the Struggle for Indian Sovereignty (1999). He can be reached at mario@mariogonzalezlaw.com). [Part One] Why the Docket 74-A award must be rejected By Mario Gonzalez A federal class action lawsuit called Different Horse v. Salazar was filed in U.S. District Court by the Ketterling Law Firm of Yankton, S.D. on April 15, 2009, to force the Interior Department to distribute the Dockets 74-A and 74-B Sioux land claims awards in per capita payments to tribal members. The awards with (interest) now total over $1 billion. The Rosebud Sioux Tribe has taken the le...